Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:53
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Are you able to lie, even though you have Aspergers?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ryu Ga Gotoku Studio's Project Century Gets A Strange New Title - GameSpot
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Patch Notes: New Co-op Emotes! — Warcraft Rumble - Blizzard News
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Hundreds of families displaced by Israeli air strikes on Gaza, witnesses say - BBC
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Scientists create a two-dimensional carbon material eight times stronger than graphene - Earth.com
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
How I’ll Remember Edmund White - Vulture
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Why is our generation so unhappy?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.